Financial Statement Analysis. Worth 11 to 14 percent of the exam. One session: the lesson, the rules, the method, then the questions.
The full lesson page · Back to your cockpit
Runtime 16 minutes 4 seconds, measured from the published video.
Five to ten minutes on this one unit: what the exam wants, the idea in plain words, then straight into the trap and the practice.
The exam wants you to classify a described transaction into operating, investing, or financing activities, calculate cash flow from operations under the indirect method, compare the direct and indirect presentations, and describe where IFRS gives a company a choice that US GAAP does not. No calculation here goes beyond adding and subtracting given figures.
Every cash transaction a company makes lands in one of three sections. Operating covers cash from the core business. Investing covers cash from buying or selling long-term assets. Financing covers cash from debt and equity transactions. The indirect method, used by the overwhelming majority of companies, builds cash flow from operations by starting at net income, an accrual number, and reconciling it back to actual cash using the balance sheet's own period-over-period changes. Non-cash charges such as depreciation and amortization are added back first, since they reduced net income without any cash actually leaving the company.
Working capital adjustments follow one rule applied consistently: an increase in a current asset means cash was used or not yet collected, so it is subtracted; an increase in a current liability means the company is effectively being financed by someone else's patience, so it is added. A rise in accounts receivable, for instance, means revenue was recognized but the cash behind it has not arrived yet, so it comes out of operating cash flow even though it looks, on the income statement, like good news. A rise in accounts payable means the company has not yet paid its suppliers, so that cash is still on hand and gets added.
A gain or loss on the sale of an asset needs its own careful handling. The gain already sits inside net income, but the actual cash from the sale belongs entirely in investing activities. Subtracting the gain, or adding back a loss, from operating cash flow and then reporting the full sale proceeds separately under investing is what keeps that gain from being counted twice.
The direct method reports the same total cash flow from operations as the indirect method; the two differ only in presentation, never in the bottom-line result. The direct method lists actual cash receipts and payments, cash collected from customers, cash paid to suppliers and employees, and arrives at the identical CFO figure the indirect method reaches by a different route.
US GAAP fixes the classification of interest and dividends with no flexibility: interest paid, interest received, and dividends received are always operating, and dividends paid are always financing. IFRS gives a company a genuine choice on all four of those same items, interest paid and dividends paid may be classified as operating or financing, interest received and dividends received as operating or investing, provided the company applies its choice consistently from one period to the next. A company reporting under IFRS that classifies dividends paid as an operating outflow, rather than the GAAP-mandated financing outflow, reports a lower operating cash flow than an otherwise identical GAAP company would, purely from that classification choice.
Assuming a rise in accounts receivable is good news because the company is owed more money ignores that the cash behind that revenue has not actually arrived: rising receivables are a cash outflow in the indirect method, not an inflow, exactly because the sale was made but not yet collected.
Read these before the questions, not after them. Everything here traces to this module's own lesson and to the 2026 outline.
Net income, an accrual number, becomes cash flow from operations once non-cash charges are added back and changes in operating working capital accounts, drawn directly from the balance sheet's beginning and ending balances, are applied; every adjustment in the indirect method traces back to a specific balance sheet line's change over the period.
An increase in a current asset such as receivables or inventory means cash was used or not yet collected, so it is subtracted in the indirect method; an increase in a current liability such as payables means the company is being financed by someone else's patience, so it is added. The reverse holds for decreases in either category.
A gain (or loss) on disposal already sits inside net income, but the actual cash received from the sale is entirely an investing activity; subtracting the gain (or adding back a loss) in CFO and reporting the full proceeds separately in investing prevents the gain from being counted twice.
The direct method lists actual cash receipts and payments, cash collected from customers, cash paid to suppliers and employees, arriving at the same CFO total the indirect method reaches by starting from net income and adjusting; converting from one to the other means rebuilding each direct-method line from its income-statement counterpart plus or minus the related balance sheet change, for example cash collected from customers equals revenue minus an increase (or plus a decrease) in accounts receivable.
Under US GAAP, interest paid, interest received, and dividends received are always operating, and dividends paid are always financing, with no flexibility. Under IFRS, all four items may be classified in either of two categories, interest paid and dividends paid as operating or financing, interest received and dividends received as operating or investing, provided the choice is applied consistently period to period.
The one-line rule for every working capital adjustment in the indirect method. Apply it mechanically to receivables, inventory, and payables and the sign is never in doubt.
Interest paid, interest received, dividends paid, dividends received. GAAP fixes all four (operating, operating, operating, financing respectively for received-received-paid-received... memorize as: interest paid=operating, interest received=operating, dividends received=operating, dividends paid=financing). IFRS lets the company choose for each of the four, consistently applied.
Removing the gain (or adding back the loss) from CFO and posting the entire sale proceeds to investing is the only way to avoid double-counting the disposal in two sections at once.
The order to work a question of this type in, every time, before you touch the numbers.
Pick an answer, say how sure you are, then reveal. Being sure and wrong is the most useful thing that can happen in a session, so answer honestly: it sends the unit back to learning and puts it at the front of your revision queue.
Under US GAAP, interest paid on long-term debt is most likely classified in the cash flow statement as:
How sure are you?
Unit: analyzing-statements-of-cash-flows-i
A company using the indirect method starts with net income of $500,000. Depreciation expense is $80,000. Accounts receivable increased by $30,000. Inventory decreased by $20,000. Accounts payable decreased by $15,000. Cash flow from operations (CFO) is closest to:
How sure are you?
Unit: analyzing-statements-of-cash-flows-i
Under IFRS, dividends paid by a company can most likely be classified in the statement of cash flows as:
How sure are you?
Unit: analyzing-statements-of-cash-flows-i
Which of the following is most likely classified as an investing activity in the cash flow statement?
How sure are you?
Unit: analyzing-statements-of-cash-flows-i
A firm reports net income of $200,000. It has $40,000 of depreciation, a $25,000 gain on sale of equipment, and a $10,000 increase in accrued liabilities. Under the indirect method, CFO is closest to:
How sure are you?
Unit: analyzing-statements-of-cash-flows-i
Free cash flow to the firm (FCFF) is most likely described as:
How sure are you?
Unit: analyzing-statements-of-cash-flows-i
Under IFRS, interest received from loans made to other parties is most likely classified in the cash flow statement as:
How sure are you?
Unit: analyzing-statements-of-cash-flows-i
A company issues $5 million in common stock and simultaneously uses $3 million to purchase equipment. How should these be reported in the cash flow statement, most likely?
How sure are you?
Unit: analyzing-statements-of-cash-flows-i
Compared to the indirect method, the direct method of presenting operating cash flows, most likely:
How sure are you?
Unit: analyzing-statements-of-cash-flows-i
A company has the following data: CFO = $800,000; Capital expenditures = $300,000; Proceeds from sale of equipment = $50,000; Net borrowings = $200,000. FCFF is closest to:
How sure are you?
Unit: analyzing-statements-of-cash-flows-i
Which of the following items would a company report as a SUPPLEMENTAL disclosure to its statement of cash flows rather than within the main body, most likely?
How sure are you?
Unit: analyzing-statements-of-cash-flows-i
An analyst observes that a firm's CFO has been consistently lower than net income for three consecutive years. This pattern most likely indicates:
How sure are you?
Unit: analyzing-statements-of-cash-flows-i
A company reports net income of $500,000. During the year, accounts receivable increased $40,000, inventory decreased $25,000, accounts payable decreased $15,000, and depreciation expense was $60,000. The company also purchased equipment for $200,000 cash. Combining the indirect-method CFO reconciliation with the correct classification of the equipment purchase, cash flow from operations is closest to:
How sure are you?
Unit: analyzing-statements-of-cash-flows-i
A company using the indirect method reports an increase in deferred tax liabilities of $30,000 during the year and also reports a gain on the sale of equipment of $10,000 within net income. Combining the treatment of non-cash items with the treatment of investing-related gains in the CFO reconciliation, the correct indirect-method adjustments to net income are most likely to:
How sure are you?
Unit: analyzing-statements-of-cash-flows-i