Practice: Introduction to the Global Investment Performance Standards (GIPS)

Ethical and Professional Standards. 14 question(s) in this unit's pool (2 above the exam). Free up to ten a day; the coach picks which ones based on what you have already answered and when each is next due.

Ethical and Professional StandardsIntroduction to the Global Investment Performance Standards (GIPS)
Your state on this unit Not started

Read the lesson for this unit · Back to your map

Today's practice

Pick an answer, say how sure you are, then reveal. Every wrong choice gets its own explanation. Questions you have already answered correctly and confidently stay out of the way until they are due for review again.

Question 1Exam level

Alpha Asset Management claims it complies with the Global Investment Performance Standards (GIPS) for its equity portfolios. Is this a valid GIPS compliance claim, most likely?

How sure are you?

Correct: B. The correct answer is No, because GIPS compliance must be claimed on a firm-wide basis.
A. You might intuitively think performance standards should apply at the strategy level since composites are strategy-based. GIPS is firm-wide. The composite structure organizes performance reporting within the firm, but the compliance claim applies to the entire firm, not individual strategies.
C. You might confuse the verification requirement with the compliance requirement. Verification is voluntary and increases credibility, but it is NOT required to claim GIPS compliance. A firm can be GIPS-compliant without ever having been verified.

Unit: introduction-to-the-global-investment-performance-standards-gips

Question 2Exam level

Under GIPS standards, which of the following portfolios MUST be included in at least one composite?

How sure are you?

Correct: B. The correct answer is All fee-paying discretionary accounts managed by the firm.
A. Fee-paying is one of the two criteria, so candidates stop there. Non-discretionary fee-paying accounts are excluded. If the client controls the portfolio decisions, it doesn't reflect the firm's strategy and should not be in a composite.
C. Sounds most comprehensive. If GIPS is about fairness, surely all accounts should count. Including non-discretionary accounts would actually distort performance. Those reflect client decisions, not firm skill. GIPS excludes them for this reason.

Unit: introduction-to-the-global-investment-performance-standards-gips

Question 3Exam level

Which of the following statements about GIPS verification is MOST accurate?

How sure are you?

Correct: B. The correct answer is GIPS verification is voluntary but increases the credibility of a firm's compliance claim.
A. Sounds like what verification should do. Confirm specific numbers. Verification covers firm-wide policies and procedures, not specific composites. Verification of a specific composite is called 'performance examination' and is an additional engagement.
C. You might confuse verification with the financial statement audit they know from accounting. GIPS verification is an investment performance review of whether the firm's performance processes and policies comply with GIPS. It is not an audit of financial statements.

Unit: introduction-to-the-global-investment-performance-standards-gips

Question 4Harder

Sarah Chen, CFA, was the lead portfolio manager for a small-cap growth composite at her previous employer for seven years, generating top-quartile returns. She has recently joined Beta Capital and wants to market the track record she built at her previous firm. Under GIPS, this track record, most likely:

How sure are you?

Correct: B. The correct answer is May be used if the prior performance is clearly documented, the appropriate people and accounts moved with her, and she discloses that it was achieved at a prior firm.
A. Intuitive. She didn't own the firm, so the record belongs to the old employer. GIPS specifically permits portability when conditions are met, precisely to prevent firms from unfairly hiding relevant manager history.
C. Third-party verification sounds like the appropriate safeguard for something this sensitive. Verification is never required under GIPS. Track record portability has its own set of specific conditions; third-party verification is not one of them.

Unit: introduction-to-the-global-investment-performance-standards-gips

Question 5Exam level

Under GIPS standards, the minimum performance history a firm must initially present when claiming compliance is most likely:

How sure are you?

Correct: B. The correct answer is Five years of GIPS-compliant performance, or since inception if the firm has existed less than five years.
A. Three years is a common performance threshold in institutional investing (e.g., manager evaluation periods). The GIPS minimum is five years for initial compliance. Three years has no basis in the GIPS standards.
C. You might confuse the initial minimum (5 years) with the long-term target (10 years). Ten years is the target to build toward, not the initial minimum. A new firm cannot present 10 years of history if it hasn't existed that long.

Unit: introduction-to-the-global-investment-performance-standards-gips

Question 6Harder

Gamma Investment Management wants to present net-of-fee returns to prospective clients. The firm has multiple fee schedules for different client tiers. Under GIPS, Gamma may most likely:

How sure are you?

Correct: C. The correct answer is Present net-of-fee returns using model fees, provided the model fee is the highest fee applicable to the composite.
A. When fees vary, candidates assume you can't fairly calculate a single net-of-fee return. GIPS specifically allows model fees to solve this problem. Presenting only gross returns would not satisfy the requirement to show net-of-fee performance.
B. Highest fee = lowest performance = most conservative. This sounds right. The distinction is 'model fee that is the highest fee APPLICABLE to the composite' not 'highest actual fee paid.' The GIPS rule uses 'model' fee when actual fees vary. Not the actual maximum fee charged.

Unit: introduction-to-the-global-investment-performance-standards-gips

Question 7Exam level

Delta Fund Management has been in business for eight years. When initially claiming GIPS compliance, Delta must most likely present:

How sure are you?

Correct: B. The correct answer is Five years of GIPS-compliant performance.
A. Delta has eight years of history, so presenting all of it seems correct. GIPS specifies a five-year initial minimum. Presenting eight years is permitted but not required. The question asks for the minimum.
C. The 10-year target is well-known. You might confuse it with the initial requirement. Ten years is the eventual target, built toward after initial compliance. Delta only has eight years of history anyway.

Unit: introduction-to-the-global-investment-performance-standards-gips

Question 8Exam level

Epsilon Wealth Advisors manages both discretionary portfolios (where it makes all investment decisions) and non-discretionary portfolios (where clients make final decisions). Under GIPS, Epsilon, most likely:

How sure are you?

Correct: B. The correct answer is Must include all discretionary portfolios in at least one composite but may include non-discretionary portfolios at its discretion with disclosure.
A. Comprehensiveness sounds like good compliance. Include everything. Including non-discretionary portfolios in composites would distort the composite's representation of the firm's investment skill, since those portfolios reflect client decisions.
C. Disclosure solves many GIPS issues, so this seems like a reasonable answer. Disclosure doesn't create an exemption from the composite inclusion requirement for fee-paying discretionary accounts. The rule is mandatory, not just a disclosure matter.

Unit: introduction-to-the-global-investment-performance-standards-gips

Question 9Exam level

Which of the following BEST describes the PRIMARY purpose of the GIPS standards?

How sure are you?

Correct: C. The correct answer is To enable fair, comparable, and credible performance presentations by investment management firms to prospective clients.
A. Conflicts of interest disclosure is a major CFA Standards theme. You might blend GIPS with Standard VI. Conflict-of-interest disclosure is Standard VI(A) of the CFA Code and Standards. GIPS is specifically about performance presentation standards, not conflicts of interest.
B. GIPS does establish calculation methodologies. 'Mandatory' seems correct given that GIPS has detailed rules. GIPS compliance itself is VOLUNTARY. The calculation methodologies within GIPS are required only if a firm chooses to claim compliance. There is no legal or regulatory mandate forcing firms to adopt GIPS.

Unit: introduction-to-the-global-investment-performance-standards-gips

Question 10Exam level

A GIPS-compliant firm is creating a new composite for its global macro strategy. A portfolio that has been managed under the global macro strategy for three months is currently losing money. The firm argues it is too early to include this portfolio in the composite. Under GIPS, most likely:

How sure are you?

Correct: A. The correct answer is The firm must include the portfolio in the composite on a timely and consistent basis once it meets the composite definition, regardless of performance.
B. Six months sounds like an internal 'ramp-up' period that might be allowed for new strategies. No performance-based delay is permitted. The entire point of the mandatory composite inclusion rule is to prevent this kind of exclusion.
C. A written policy plus disclosure is often the GIPS solution to flexibility. It sounds procedurally correct. A written policy cannot override the mandatory composite inclusion rule. No policy permits performance-based exclusions.

Unit: introduction-to-the-global-investment-performance-standards-gips

Question 11Harder

Zeta Capital Management achieved exceptional returns for its high-yield bond composite over the past decade. Zeta's marketing materials state: 'Zeta Capital is in compliance with GIPS.' The materials present only the high-yield composite performance. Has Zeta violated GIPS, most likely?

How sure are you?

Correct: B. The correct answer is Yes, because presenting only one composite while claiming firm-wide GIPS compliance is misleading if other composites with lower performance exist and are omitted from the presentation.
A. The firm said 'full compliance' not 'partial compliance.' That sounds correct. Stating full compliance while presenting only favorable composites in marketing can violate the spirit of GIPS. The claim of compliance doesn't immunize the firm against cherry-picking in practice.
C. It seems reasonable that a firm can highlight its best strategy in marketing. GIPS does not allow composite selection to be performance-driven. The firm can present specific composites to relevant prospective clients, but cannot systematically exclude underperforming composites from all marketing.

Unit: introduction-to-the-global-investment-performance-standards-gips

Question 12Harder

Under GIPS, a non-fee-paying discretionary portfolio (such as a firm's own capital managed internally), most likely:

How sure are you?

Correct: B. The correct answer is May be included in a composite, but the firm must disclose the percentage of composite assets represented by non-fee-paying portfolios.
A. If GIPS requires all discretionary accounts to be included, it seems like non-fee-paying discretionary accounts would also be required. The GIPS rule applies to 'all actual, fee-paying, discretionary accounts.' The 'fee-paying' qualifier explicitly excludes accounts like firm proprietary capital.
C. Performance-conditional inclusion sounds like a nuanced rule. Performance-based inclusion decisions are the exact opposite of what GIPS is designed to prevent. No performance condition can determine composite inclusion.

Unit: introduction-to-the-global-investment-performance-standards-gips

Question 13Above the exam

A newly GIPS-compliant firm wants to advertise, in its very first compliant presentation, a 12-year composite track record built entirely from performance generated before the firm began claiming compliance. Combining the GIPS minimum track record requirement with the firm's own 12 years of available history, the presentation is most likely required to show:

How sure are you?

Correct: B. GIPS requires firms to present a minimum of five years of GIPS-compliant performance (or since firm/composite inception if the firm or composite has existed for less than five years), building up to a minimum of ten years over time by adding one year of compliant history annually. A firm cannot simply present 12 years of pre-compliance history as if it were GIPS-compliant; each year presented must itself meet GIPS requirements.
A. GIPS does not require presenting every year of available history; it sets a MINIMUM (5 years, building to 10) precisely so firms are not forced to either present a shorter track record than they have or falsely present all of their pre-compliance history as compliant.
C. Three years is not the GIPS minimum track record requirement; the minimum is five years (or since inception, if shorter), building toward ten years as the firm accumulates additional compliant years.

Unit: introduction-to-the-global-investment-performance-standards-gips

Question 14Above the exam

A firm claims GIPS compliance for its overall business but excludes several small, poor-performing discretionary fee-paying portfolios from any composite, describing this as 'immaterial.' Applying both the composite construction requirement and the total firm definition together, this practice is most likely:

How sure are you?

Correct: B. GIPS requires that every actual, fee-paying, discretionary portfolio be included in at least one composite defined by the firm's own composite construction policies; there is no materiality carve-out that lets a firm cherry-pick out poor performers to flatter its reported results. Selectively excluding underperforming discretionary accounts strikes directly at the purpose of the total firm definition, which exists to prevent exactly this kind of composite construction abuse.
A. GIPS does not grant firms discretion to exclude discretionary, fee-paying portfolios on materiality grounds; the requirement to include all such portfolios in at least one composite is unconditional, precisely to prevent firms from selectively hiding weak results.
C. The violation here does not turn on discretionary versus non-discretionary status; non-discretionary portfolios are correctly excluded from composites under GIPS because the firm does not control their management, but these are described as discretionary, which is exactly the category GIPS requires to be included.

Unit: introduction-to-the-global-investment-performance-standards-gips