Fixed Income, LOS weight share 0.8 percent of the 365 Level I learning outcomes.
Duration alone always understates a bond's actual price gain when yields fall and always overstates its actual price loss when yields rise, and the exam's convexity questions exist entirely to test whether a candidate remembers to add back the piece duration leaves out.
Answer these three first. Getting them wrong now is normal, and it helps the lesson stick. Reveal the answers when you're done, then read on.
1. A bond has a modified duration of 7.5 and a convexity of 65. If yields rise by 100 basis points, the estimated percentage price change, using both duration and convexity, is closest to:
2. A callable corporate bond is currently trading well above its call price because interest rates have fallen sharply. Relative to an otherwise identical option-free bond, this callable bond's convexity is most likely:
3. Two bonds have identical modified duration. Bond A has a convexity of 40; Bond B has a convexity of 90. For a large, equal-magnitude change in yield in either direction, which bond is expected to perform better?
Runtime 9 minutes 50 seconds, measured from the published video.
Five to ten minutes on this one unit: what the exam wants, the idea in plain words, then straight into the trap and the practice.
The exam wants you to calculate the convexity-adjusted percentage price change, describe why convexity is always positive for an option-free bond and what drives it higher, describe when a callable bond or MBS turns negatively convex, and calculate portfolio duration and convexity as market-value-weighted averages.
Duration draws a straight tangent line against the actual price-yield curve, and that line is only ever exactly right at the single point it touches. Convexity is the correction for everything the straight line misses: the full approximation is %change in price is approximately -(modified duration)(change in yield) + 0.5(convexity)(change in yield)^2. The first term is the linear, duration-only estimate; the second term is the convexity adjustment, correcting for the fact that the true price-yield relationship curves rather than running straight.
For an option-free bond, convexity is always a positive number. Because the yield change is squared in the adjustment term, that correction is always added, never subtracted, regardless of whether yields rose or fell. This means duration alone systematically understates an option-free bond's actual behavior in both directions. It understates the real price gain when yields fall, and it overstates the real price loss when yields rise. Convexity, for an option-free bond, always works in the investor's favor.
Convexity rises with the same three drivers that raise duration: longer maturity, lower coupon, lower yield. It scales roughly with duration squared. A zero-coupon bond carries the highest convexity of any bond at a given maturity and yield, for the same reason it carries the highest duration. Every dollar of cash flow arrives at a single future date. Nothing pulls that concentration in earlier the way coupon payments would, which maximizes the curvature of the price-yield relationship rather than minimizing it. The word zero describes the coupon, never the convexity.
Callable bonds and mortgage-backed securities can turn negatively convex, but only once the embedded option sits at or near the money. A callable bond behaves like an ordinary option-free bond, with ordinary positive convexity, whenever yields stay high enough that its call option remains far out of the money. Only once yields fall enough that the bond's price approaches or exceeds its call price does the issuer's incentive to actually call the bond cap further price appreciation. The price-yield curve bends backward into negative convexity. That negative convexity is conditional on where yields currently sit, never a fixed, permanent property of being callable in the first place. An exam answer that states callable bonds always carry negative convexity is a false absolute.
Portfolio duration and portfolio convexity are each computed the same way: a market-value-weighted average of the individual measure across every bond held, weight times duration (or convexity), summed across the whole portfolio. Both figures remain local, linear-plus-quadratic approximations, valid mainly for small-to-moderate parallel shifts in the yield curve; neither one captures a non-parallel shift, where short and long rates move by different amounts at the same time.
A bond has a modified duration of 6.03 and a convexity of 52. If yields rise by 100 basis points, what is the estimated percentage price change using both duration and convexity? Duration term = -(modified duration) x (change in yield) = -6.03 x 0.01 = -6.03 percent. Convexity adjustment = 0.5 x convexity x (change in yield)^2 = 0.5 x 52 x (0.01)^2 = 0.26 percent. Total estimated price change = -6.03 + 0.26 = -5.77 percent, a smaller loss than the duration-only estimate of -6.03 percent would suggest.
Same bond: modified duration 6.03, convexity 52, yields rise 100 basis points. Compute the duration term and the convexity adjustment separately, then add them yourself.
Modified duration = 6.03, convexity = 52. Yields rise 100 bps. Find the convexity-adjusted % price change.
Subtracting the convexity adjustment when yields rise mistakes what squaring the yield change actually does: (change in yield) squared is always positive regardless of direction, so for a positively convex, option-free bond the adjustment is always added, never subtracted, whichever way yields moved.
Verbatim from the 2026 CFA Level I topic outline. Every practice question and key rule below is tagged to one of these where the stem and explanation make the match clear.
Written from this module's own lesson and the 2026 CFA Level I topic outline, in teaching order, each tagged to the learning outcome it belongs to where that is clear.
The complete approximation is %delta-P is approximately -(Modified Duration)(delta-Y) + 0.5(Convexity)(delta-Y)^2. The first term is the linear, duration-only estimate; the second term is the convexity adjustment, which corrects for the fact that the true price-yield relationship is a curve, not a straight line. The convexity adjustment is always added, and because delta-Y is squared, it is always non-negative for a bond with positive convexity, regardless of whether yields rose or fell.
For an option-free bond, convexity is a positive number, which means the convexity adjustment always adds to the estimated price change: it reduces the magnitude of an estimated price decline when yields rise, and it increases the magnitude of an estimated price gain when yields fall. Duration alone therefore systematically understates both price gains and price declines for an option-free bond; the larger the yield change, the larger this understatement becomes, which is why the duration-only approximation is least reliable for large yield moves.
A zero-coupon bond has the highest convexity of any bond at a given maturity and yield, because its entire cash flow sits at a single future date, maximizing the dispersion of cash flows around the duration point; a higher-coupon bond returns more value sooner, reducing both duration and convexity. As yield level rises, convexity falls, because a higher discount rate compresses the present-value weight of the most distant cash flows, reducing their contribution to the curvature. These are the same three drivers that raise duration, and convexity is not an independent, unrelated property, it scales approximately with the square of duration.
A callable bond behaves like an ordinary option-free bond, with ordinary positive convexity, whenever yields are high enough that its call option is far out of the money; only when yields fall enough that the bond's price approaches or exceeds its call price does the issuer's incentive to call cap further price appreciation, bending the price-yield curve backward into negative convexity. A mortgage-backed security exhibits the same effect for the same underlying reason (the investor is effectively short an embedded option to the borrower), because falling rates accelerate mortgage prepayments and return principal to the investor exactly when it must be reinvested at the new, lower rates. Neither instrument has permanently negative convexity, the sign is conditional on the prevailing yield level relative to the option's exercise price.
Portfolio duration and portfolio convexity are each calculated as the market-value-weighted average of the corresponding measure across every bond held, weight_i multiplied by duration_i (or convexity_i), summed across the portfolio. Both remain local, linear-plus-quadratic approximations valid mainly for small-to-moderate, parallel shifts in the yield curve; they do not capture a non-parallel shift (the curve twisting or steepening rather than moving uniformly), and duration in particular becomes an increasingly unreliable estimate as the size of the yield change grows, which is precisely the gap convexity is added to narrow, not eliminate entirely.
Authored only where a key rule has an arbitrary number, list, or formula shape worth a memory device; a module with none of those has no tricks here, on purpose.
Squaring delta-Y removes its sign, so 0.5 x Convexity x (delta-Y)^2 is positive whether yields rose or fell; a candidate who subtracts this term when yields rise has the direction of the correction backward.
The word 'zero' describes the coupon, not the convexity; with all cash flow concentrated at a single maturity date, a zero-coupon bond has the highest convexity of any bond sharing that maturity and yield.
The same callable bond has ordinary positive convexity when yields are high (call far out of the money) and negative convexity only once yields have fallen enough to put the call at or in the money; 'callable bonds always have negative convexity' is a false absolute the exam tests directly.
Authored, ordered steps for answering this module's question types; a calculation module's calculator-dependent step ends with a bracketed BA II Plus keystroke sequence.
Condensed from the key rules and tricks above, nothing new. What you'd want on one index card the night before.
Pick an answer, say how sure you are, then reveal. Every wrong choice gets its own explanation. 10 question(s) available for this unit.
A bond has a modified duration of 7.5 and a convexity of 65. If yields increase by 100 basis points (1.0%), the best estimate of the bond's percentage price change is closest to:
How sure are you?
Unit: yield-based-bond-convexity-and-portfolio-properties
Which of the following bonds is most likely to exhibit negative convexity?
How sure are you?
Unit: yield-based-bond-convexity-and-portfolio-properties
Bond A has a modified duration of 8 and convexity of 80. Bond B has a modified duration of 8 and convexity of 120. If interest rates fall by 200 basis points, which bond most likely has the higher price appreciation?
How sure are you?
Unit: yield-based-bond-convexity-and-portfolio-properties
The convexity adjustment in the bond price change formula is most likely expressed as:
How sure are you?
Unit: yield-based-bond-convexity-and-portfolio-properties
A portfolio manager states: 'Given two bonds with identical duration, I always prefer the one with higher convexity.' Under which condition is this preference NOT fully justified on a standalone basis, most likely?
How sure are you?
Unit: yield-based-bond-convexity-and-portfolio-properties
A mortgage-backed security (MBS) exhibits negative convexity primarily because, most likely:
How sure are you?
Unit: yield-based-bond-convexity-and-portfolio-properties
Two bonds have the same yield and maturity. Bond X is a zero-coupon bond. Bond Y is a 10% coupon bond. Which most likely has higher convexity, and why?
How sure are you?
Unit: yield-based-bond-convexity-and-portfolio-properties
A bond has modified duration of 6.0 and annual convexity of 50. If yields fall by 150 basis points, the estimated percentage price change is closest to:
How sure are you?
Unit: yield-based-bond-convexity-and-portfolio-properties
A bond has a modified duration of 7.0 and convexity of 60. Using the full duration-plus-convexity approximation, combining both effects for a 200-basis-point INCREASE in yield, the estimated percentage price change is closest to:
How sure are you?
Unit: yield-based-bond-convexity-and-portfolio-properties
Bond P and Bond Q have identical modified duration but Bond P has higher convexity than Bond Q. Combining the meaning of convexity with the duration-based price approximation, for a LARGE change in yield in EITHER direction, an investor should most likely expect:
How sure are you?
Unit: yield-based-bond-convexity-and-portfolio-properties
Answer the questions above, then press the button.